unnamed

The eternal dilemma – Internal Selection or National Final? Which path leads to victory at Eurovision?

Every year, as the Eurovision Song Contest approaches, one question inevitably dominates fan discussions: is it better to choose a representative internally or to organize a public national final?

This dilemma regularly sparks debates among both the public and experts, as both approaches have their own advantages and challenges. An internal selection allows broadcasters to carefully choose an artist and a song, often tailored for the international stage and current music trends, while a national final gives the public a sense of participation and creates a spectacular event that builds fan support from the very beginning.

Although it might seem at first glance that one system gives a greater chance of victory, Eurovision history shows that a universal formula for success simply does not exist. Triumphs come from both worlds, and a winning combination often depends on song quality, stage performance, timing, and, of course, a little luck.

This very uncertainty is what makes Eurovision a competition that captivates attention and ignites passionate debates among fans year after year.

Internal Selection – Trust in the Experts and the Secret Weapon

An internal selection, where the broadcaster alone chooses the artist and song, is often seen as the safest option. The main advantage is that it eliminates the element of chance: the decision is in the hands of professionals who search for the ideal combination of voice, song, and stage vision. This approach often leads to the selection of established artists with already-built careers and confidence on stage. For example, numerous Eurovision winners—from Austria’s Conchita Wurst to the Netherlands’ Duncan Laurence—were the result of an internal selection.

Another advantage of this method is that broadcasters have complete control over the process. The song is chosen strategically, taking into account music trends, audience expectations, and the potential for a spectacular stage performance.

However, the price of this approach can be a loss of connection with the home audience. Fans can sometimes feel excluded, as they are denied the right to influence the decision with their vote. And without strong domestic support, a carefully crafted song might be left without broader momentum.

Foto: Thomas Hanses / EBU

Foto: Thomas Hanses / EBU

National final – A festival of music and the power of the people’s vote

National finals, such as Sweden’s Melodifestivalen or Italy’s Sanremo, are much more than just a selection process—they are genuine music festivals and social events. Broadcasters get massive viewership, artists receive media attention, and the public feels like they are part of a major process. This very interaction creates strong support and a sense of community around the representative heading to Eurovision.

A big advantage of a national final is that the song and artist go through a „baptism of fire“ in front of their home audience. It’s an opportunity to test the stage performance, gauge reactions, and for the artist to feel the pressure of the competition before the Eurovision stage itself. Additionally, national finals often produce hits that outlive Eurovision, which further strengthens the country’s music industry.

However, this path also has its pitfalls: a song that wins the hearts of the domestic audience does not necessarily „click“ with the international crowd. Local popularity can sometimes prove misleading, and it has happened that a national final favorite ends up at the bottom of the scoreboard at Eurovision.

Foto: Thomas Hanses / EBU

Foto: Thomas Hanses / EBU

Which model brings victory?

The question of „which model brings victory“ has no simple answer, as everything depends on the moment and context, and Eurovision history is full of twists. Sometimes it’s the winners of national finals, as was the case from 2006 to 2013, and sometimes it’s internal selections, which is a trend we’ve been witnessing in recent years.

However, the methods of selection are varied, and we’ve analyzed every Eurovision winner from 2000 to today to discover which path has most often led to triumph. When we look at the last 25 years and 25 winners, the statistics clearly show that the national final is the most dominant model.

The winning song came from a competition like Beovizija or Melodifestivalen as many as 15 times. Just remember our own Marija Šerifović and her „Molitva“, Russia’s representative Dima Bilan, or Loreen, who triumphed both times through the Swedish national final.

Foto: EBU

Foto: EBU

When it comes to internal selection, it has brought victory 6 times. The most recent examples are the winners Nemo and JJ, but we must not forget legendary songs like „Everyway That I Can“ by Sertab Erener, „Wild Dances“ by Ruslana, „Rise Like a Phoenix“ by Conchita Wurst, or „Arcade“ by Duncan Laurence.

Many of these songs have become true „evergreens.“ The Turkish song is still a favorite today, as we saw in the interval act of this year’s final, and the Dutch „Arcade“ is one of the most streamed Eurovision songs on platforms like Spotify.

Foto: Alma-Bengtsson / EBU

Foto: Alma-Bengtsson / EBU

There is also a third, mixed model, which combines elements of both internal and national selection. This is the case when, for example, an artist is chosen internally, but the song is selected by public vote, or vice versa. This model brought victory to Helena Paparizou in 2005, whose artist was chosen internally while the song was selected in a national final. It was similar with Netta in 2018, when the artist was chosen via a TV show, and the song was confirmed internally.

Although it seems that national finals still hold the primacy, recent years show a growing success for internal selections. Below, you will find a detailed overview of all the winners since 2000 and the path they took to fame before stepping onto the grand Eurovision stage.

Winners’ table 

Year Winner — Song Conutry Selection method 
2000 Olsen Brothers — Fly on the Wings of Love  Denmark National final — Dansk Melodi Grand Prix
2001 Tanel Padar, Dave Benton & 2XL — Everybody  Estonia National final — Eurolaul
2002 Marie N (Marija Naumova) — I Wanna  Latvia National final — Eirodziesma
2003 Sertab Erener — Everyway That I Can  Turkey Internal selection
2004 Ruslana — Wild Dances  Ukraine Internal selection
2005 Helena Paparizou — My Number One  Greece Mixed — artist (Helena) selected internally, song selected in national final (TV song selection)
2006 Lordi — Hard Rock Hallelujah  Finland National final — Euroviisut / UMK format
2007 Marija Šerifović — Molitva  Serbia National final — Beovizija
2008 Dima Bilan — Believe  Russia National final — Evrovidenie 
2009 Alexander Rybak — Fairytale  Norway National final — Melodi Grand Prix
2010 Lena Meyer-Landrut — Satellite  Germany National final — Unser Star für Oslo
2011 Ell & Nikki — Running Scared  Azerbaijan Mixed — artists selected through Milli Seçim Turu (national selection), while the song was selected internally
2012 Loreen — Euphoria  Sweden National final — Melodifestivalen
2013 Emmelie de Forest — Only Teardrops  Denmark National final — Dansk Melodi Grand Prix
2014 Conchita Wurst — Rise Like a Phoenix  Austria Internal selection
2015 Måns Zelmerlöw — Heroes  Sweden National final — Melodifestivalen
2016 Jamala — 1944  Ukraine National final — Vidbir 
2017 Salvador Sobral — Amar pelos dois  Portugal National final — Festival da Canção
2018 Netta — Toy  Israel Mixed — Artist selected via HaKokhav HaBa (TV Selection), song confirmed internally
2019 Duncan Laurence — Arcade  Netherland Internal selection
2020 OTKAZANO (pandemija COVID-19) Takmičenje je otkazano 2020. (nema pobednika)
2021 Måneskin — Zitti e buoni  Italy National final — Sanremo Music Festival 
2022 Kalush Orchestra — Stefania  Ukraine National final — Vidbir 
2023 Loreen — Tattoo  Sweden National final — Melodifestivalen
2024 Nemo — The Code  Switzerland Internal selection
2025 JJ — Wasted Love  Austria Internal selection